Grubb's Argument

Attending SFCC is a place where one can accomplish goals and do so by taking the right courses to achieve such goal. At SFCC I plan to take the required courses to attain my A.A and transfer to the University of Washington. Where I intend to graduate and attend medical school where i would like to become an ObGyn. SFCC was my choice for my degree not just because of the courses but also because of the environment. Most of the other students here have the same goals as me, and most of my friends attend too, which makes it a lot easier to get work done and have a conversation when you run into someone that you know. Also its a lot easier to make friends. The whole reason that I am attending college in the first place is to better my education in the occupation that I have been pursuing ever since I was in high school. College and any schooling for that matter is not just to teach kids the basic skills of math, reading, and writing, but to help them decide and prepare for what they want to be when they grow up, and give them the necessary tools to become whatever they want. What I got out of Grubb's argument is that more high schools should incorporate volcanism in their teaching so that students are more prepared for future occupations that they wish to acquire. This is true because most of the students in college are only going to school to further their education to pursue that certain job that they want. If they use volcanism in high school then more children will be able to decide early on what they want to be or major in after high school. Cause most high school student have no idea what they want to be when they grow up or even if they want to further their education. Grubb's argument and my goals in school relate on a high level because my goal is to go to school to gain experience in my occupation and that is what Grubb is trying to push more to make students better prepared for their future.